by Mary Ann Collins
“The Da Vinci Code” is the biggest book phenomenon
since “Harry Potter.” Since its publication in March 2003, “The Da Vinci
Code” sold 6 million copies in its first year and it has been translated into more
than 40 languages. As of May 2004, 7.35 million copies were in print, the book had been on
the New York Times Bestseller list for 58 weeks (often in the number one position), and it
was selling between 80,000 and 90,000 copies per week. ABC did a TV special based on the
book. [Note 1]
The story is set against a backdrop of religious and
“historical” statements that are claimed to be “facts.” These are a
mixture of anti-Christian teachings, radical feminist theology, and goddess worship. For
example, the book says that the early Christians did not believe in the divinity of
Christ; the Resurrection never happened; our Bible is the result of a political power play
by the Roman Emperor Constantine; and early Christians worshiped the “divine
feminine.” These statements are made by a likeable expert, a Harvard professor who
(in the context of the novel) seems to be credible and authoritative.
Readers can become so engrossed in the fast-moving, suspenseful
story that they swallow these so-called “facts” without even realizing it.
Storytelling can be a powerful tool for changing the way that people think. This is
especially true with movies, and
Perhaps you are saying to yourself, “No thinking person
would take that kind of thing seriously.” That is exactly what one Evangelical leader
thought--until he started talking with people who had read the book. He discovered that
the book hardens the unbelief of people who aren’t Christians, and it turns honest
seekers away from Christianity. The book even caused some Christians to become confused
and disillusioned. [Note 3]
The Bible warns us to be “sober” (not carried away
with emotions) and “vigilant.” There is an enemy of our souls who is looking for
opportunities to undermine our faith and “devour” us. (1 Peter 5:8)
Jesus warned us not to be deceived. So did the Apostle Paul. The
Bible says,
“And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no
man deceive you.” (Matthew 24:4)
“Beware lest any man spoil [ruin] you through philosophy
and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not
after Christ.” (Colossians 2:8)
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter
times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of
devils” (1 Timothy 4:1)
There are some Biblical principles that will help protect us
from deception. The third chapter of Genesis gives us three keys to deception. If we spot
any of these things, then we need to be on guard.
HATH GOD SAID
“And he [the serpent] said unto the woman, Yea, hath God
said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?” (Genesis 3:1)
“Hath God said?” In other words, did God really say
it? Did He really mean it? Can we trust what He said?
The beachhead for the assault is to plant doubts about the
credibility and reliability of what God told us. In practical terms, this means trying to
undermine our confidence in the Bible.
CLAIMING TO BE AN
“EXPERT”
“And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not
surely die” (Genesis 3:4)
In other words, “I’m the expert. Listen to me. I know
better than God does. I know better than you do.”
This stage tries to replace our trust in God with trust in an
“expert.” It is also an attempt to try to undermine our motives for obeying God.
Do you remember
There was a point where
This is a vivid illustration of the importance of listening to
God instead of listening to “experts.” When the “experts” go contrary
to Scripture, then we need to follow the Bible.
SAYING OR IMPLYING
THAT GOD WANTS TO
PREVENT US FROM HAVING GOOD THINGS
“For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then
your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” (Genesis
3:5)
In other words, God is holding out on you. He is keeping
something good from you. If you do things my way, then you can have that good thing.
This stage tries to give us motives to disobey God. In addition,
it promises independence. It says that we can be like God and do things our way instead of
His way. It tries to give us reasons to think and feel that it is OK to ignore what God
told us and do whatever we want to do.
“Ye shall be as gods” is the heart of the false
promises of New Age teachings. The most overt example of this was Shirley MacLaine saying,
“I am God!”
SOME WIDELY BELIEVED DECEPTIONS
There are people who claim that important things were removed
from the Bible. This is an example of the stage of deception that tries to get us to
believe that God is holding out on us.
I first heard this in the form of a claim that Scripture
passages supporting reincarnation had been removed from the Bible. But that’s
physically impossible. There were thousands of papyrus and parchment scrolls that were
spread all over the known world. There is no way that they could all be found. And there
is no way that they could be altered. You can take a page out of a bound book, but you
can’t rip a segment out of a scroll and have the scroll remain intact.
“The Da Vinci Code” plays on this theme. It claims
that, in the fourth century, Emperor Constantine had some Gnostic “gospels” kept
out of the Bible. But
By the time of Origen (185-254 A.D.), there was general
agreement about most of the New Testament. Nobody questioned which Gospels should be
included. There was general agreement about most of the epistles. However, there was
disagreement as to whether the following six epistles should be part of the New Testament
canon: Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 John, 3 John, and Jude. [Note 5] This was more than 50
years before
If you read quotations from Gnostic “gospels,” it
quickly becomes obvious why they were never included in the Bible. I’ve read some
quotations from “The Gospel of Thomas” and other Gnostic “gospels.”
They are confusing. Some of the language seems vaguely Biblical, but the ideas don’t
make sense. There is an emphasis on secrecy. (In contrast, Jesus taught openly.)
Here are two examples of Gnostic teachings. According to the
“Gospel of Thomas,” Jesus made the following statements. [Note 6]
“The one who is acquainted with father and mother will be
called the son of a prostitute.”
“For each woman who will make herself male will enter the
kingdom of heaven.”
(No, that was not a typing mistake or something. The
“Gospel of Thomas” actually does say those things. And it claims that Jesus
taught them. Maybe that stuff makes sense to somebody who is in an “altered state of
consciousness.”)
If you want to understand gnosticism and its influence on modern
American churches, read “Pagans in the Pews” by Peter Jones (Regal Books, 2001).
His book has quotations from various Gnostic “gospels” and other Gnostic
writings.
SOME ANTI-BIBLICAL
“EXPERTS”
One example of an anti-Biblical “expert” is Sigmund
Freud, the father of psychiatry. The Bible has clear standards of sexual morality. Then
along came Freud. He told us that Biblical morality results in repression and mental
illness. Every Christian had to decide whether to listen to the “expert” (Freud)
or to trust what God told us in the Bible.
“Experts” can deceive us. Do you remember the
“Kinsey Report”? Many Americans believed the “expert” instead of
believing the Bible. Dr. Kinsey’s research is the foundation for much of our modern
sex education. It also contributed to the sexual revolution of the sixties. Kinsey has
been charged with doing fraudulent research, and with being responsible for the sexual
abuse of hundreds of children. (You can read about these things online.) [Note 7]
Another “expert” is Episcopal Bishop John Shelby
Spong. He wrote a book called “Why Christianity Must Change or Die.” He tried to
destroy people’s faith in the most foundational Christian doctrines, such as the
Resurrection of Jesus, and the Atonement (Jesus died to save us from our sins). Basically,
his idea seems to be that, in order to be relevant to the modern world, Christianity has
to stop being Christian. Spong says that we live in a world that has made the
“traditional theistic view of God inoperative.” (This information is online.)
[Note 8]
Bishop Spong is not alone. There are seminary professors who
teach the same kinds of things. Michael S. Rose wrote about this problem in some Catholic
seminaries, in his book “Goodbye, Good Men.” I have read about similar things in
some Protestant seminaries.
THE DA VINCI CODE
According to “The Da Vinci Code,” Jesus was just an
ordinary man who was not divine, did not die for our sins, and was not resurrected.
Instead, he married Mary Magdalene and had at least one child.
The “Jesus” portrayed in “The Da Vinci Code”
is not the Lord Jesus Christ of the Bible. Jesus warned us that there would be
“false Christs.” (Matthew 24:24) This is one of them. Although it is only a
mental picture in a fictional book, it has turned real people away from the real Jesus
Christ.
“The Da Vinci Code” has fortified the unbelief of
people who are not Christians. It has turned sincere seekers away from Christianity. And
it has “confused and disillusioned even many Christians.” [Note 9]
According to “The Da Vinci Code,” there is an ancient
secret society called the Priory of Sion that preserved information about Jesus and Mary
Magdalene and their descendents. However, the Priory of Sion that is portrayed in the book
is a hoax. As we will see, it never existed. It was a combination of faked history and
forged documents.
The following information comes from “The Truth Behind the
Da Vinci Code” by
There have been three Priories of Sion. The first one (from
about 1100 to 1617) was legitimate. It was a group of Catholic monks who honored the
Virgin Mary under the title of Our Lady of Zion. (In French, “
Then, in the 20th century, there were two Priories of Sion that
were both created by Pierre Plantard, a Frenchman who lived from 1920 to 2000. Plantard
was convicted of fraud and embezzlement in 1953. His first Priory of Sion began in 1956.
It was a social club with a journal. It only lasted a year.
Plantard’s second Priory of Sion is the important one, in
terms of conspiracy theory and “The Da Vinci Code.” It was an elaborate hoax. He
began fabricating it in the early 1960s. He faked its existence and he tried to make it
appear to be ancient. (As we will see, Plantard later testified that it was a fraud.)
Plantard was an occultist. He admired Hitler. He was influenced
by a pro-Nazi man named Evola who believed that mankind should be ruled by a
“government of the spiritual elite.”
Plantard’s fraudulent Priory of Sion is supposedly an
ancient secret society that preserved records of the bloodline of the supposed descendants
of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. (Plantard claimed to be one of those descendants.)
In order to make this secret society look legitimate, Plantard
forged documents and planted them in credible places, such as French museums. He even
forged certificates of authentication to go with the documents. (That could be done by
faking the signatures of experts who were dead and therefore could not be questioned.)
A French businessman named Noel Corbu bought an estate that was
previously owned by a wealthy priest named Berenger Sauniere. (The priest had become
wealthy by selling Masses. He advertised in magazines and journals, and got money from
Catholics all over
Corbu claimed that, somewhere on this estate, there was a hidden
stash of documents about the supposed descendants (bloodline) of Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
Noel Corbu knew Pierre Plantard. They wrote letters to one another. (Their letters have
been preserved.) And there are photographs of the two men together. This appears to be
another attempt to make the Priory of Sion seem real. It may have also had financial
motives. Corbu had a hotel and a restaurant on the property. Intriguing rumors can draw
curious people, who then need a place to stay (the hotel) and a place to eat (the
restaurant). People came from far away to search for hidden documents and other hidden
treasures, but nobody ever found anything.
In 1993, Roger-Patrice Pelat was murdered. He was said to be the
Grand Master of the Priory of Sion. Because of Pelat’s supposed connection with the
Priory of Sion, French authorities questioned Pierre Plantard about the murder. Plantard
said that the Priory of Sion didn’t exist. He testified that he had “made it all
up.” French authorities searched Plantard’s home and they found many
“Priory Documents,” some of which said that Plantard was the “true King of
France.”
Michael Baigent,
The cover of “The Da Vinci Code” says (in small print)
that it is a novel. However, the book itself claims that its assertions are
“facts” that are accepted by historians and scholars. When Dan Brown was
interviewed by ABC television, he said that the information in the book is accurate. In an
interview with Borders, Dan Brown said that all of the history portrayed in “The Da
Vinci Code” is accurate. Countless Internet sites have quotes from the book and treat
the historical and religious statements as being accurate. [Note 12]
Most reviewers say that the book is a well-written, fast-paced
action story. Some reviewers say that the characters are two-dimensional. That may be
related to the fast action of the story. Character development takes time. It slows things
down and gets readers thinking, as opposed to emotionally reacting to suspense and
intrigue.
One of the characters is an “expert” (a professor). He
tries to explain away the most foundational Christian beliefs and undermine the
reader’s confidence in the Bible. He claims that Christianity originally was
gnosticism and goddess worship, and that it was totally unlike everything we were taught
in church and Sunday school.
(Gnosticism is so confusing that I won’t try to explain it.
It involves secret knowledge, hidden mysteries, initiations, and bizarre teachings. If you
want to understand it, then read “Pagans in the Pews” by Peter Jones. It was
published by Regal Books in 2001.)
To a mature adult, the claims of a non-existant man in a fiction
book may not seem significant. But I had an experience that makes me take it very
seriously.
One day I was eating at a restaurant in the middle of the
afternoon, when there were few customers and the waiter had time to talk with me. He was a
nice young man, a college student who was raised in a Christian home. He said some strange
things. I responded with Christian truth. Then he replied, “But the Alchemist
said...”
My waiter had read a novel with a character called “the
Alchemist” who was portrayed as being a wise man. He encountered people with
problems, and spoke words of “wisdom” that helped them.
I told the waiter that the Alchemist’s statements were New
Age teachings. Even though the waiter had been raised in a Christian home, and went to
church in his youth, that had no impact on him. When he said something reflecting New Age
teaching, and I countered with a Christian perspective, he would reply, “But the
Alchemist said...”
I finally told him that “alchemist” is an
old-fashioned word for a sorceror. Even that had no impact on him.
The “wise” sayings of a make-believe character in a
novel had more impact on this young man’s thinking than all his previous years of
Biblical instruction in a Christian home and a Christian church. As a result of my
experience with that waiter, I take “The Da Vinci Code” very seriously.
A mature Christian, who is well grounded in his or her faith, is
likely to underestimate the impact that this kind of book can have on impressionable young
people. Especially since we live in a televised society where young people usually
don’t read much.
If you believe what Dan Brown tells you in “The Da Vinci
Code,” then you will abandon your belief in the God of the Bible, and replace it with
goddess worship. You will deny the divinity of Jesus Christ. You will deny that Jesus was
resurrected from the dead. You won’t believe that Jesus died to save you from your
sins. And you will think that your new beliefs are superior to true Christianity.
Making the book into a movie puts our young people in double
jeopardy. Movies can have a strong emotional impact. If people get caught up in the action
and suspense of the movie, then they can swallow some of the religious deception without
realizing it, because they are distracted by the action of the movie. Young people are
especially vulnerable to this. They have not yet learned the discernment of strong, mature
Christians.
Please pray for our young people.
USE OF THIS ARTICLE
You have permission to quote from this article, distribute copies of
it, translate it into other languages, and post it on your website.
NOTES
1. “Thriller Instinct,” in “The
www.danbrown.com/novels/davinci_code/articles/thriller_instinct.html
In November 2003, ABC did a special about the book.
www.christianitytoday.com/history/newsletter/2003/nov7.html
2. Information about the upcoming movie
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6471862/site/newsweek
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382625
http://www.thezreview.co.uk/comingsoon/d/davincicodethe.htm
http://www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/da_vinci_code
http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/thedavincicode
3. Chuck Colson, “The Da Vinci Conspiracy: Distinguishing Fact
from Fiction,” in the “Christian Examiner,” April 2004. (I realize that
many Christians disagree with Chuck Colson about various issues. However, his practical
approach of talking with people who read the book is helpful. And what he learned from
those people is valuable information. It demonstrates the real-life impact of the book.)
www.christiantimes.com/Articles/Chuck%20Colson/Art_Apr04_Colson.html
4.
www.rickross.com/groups/jonestown.html
www.gbs.sha.bw.schule.de/jim_jones_history.htm
www.owlnet.rice.edu/~reli291/Jonestown/Jonestown.html
5. An article about “The Da Vinci Code” that has information
about the Council of Nicea (325 A.D.), the Early Church’s belief in the divinity of
Jesus Christ, and the formation of the canon of the New Testament.
www.crosswalk.com/fun/1212187.html
Other articles about “The Da Vinci Code” that have good
information about the formation of the canon of the New Testament.
www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0413davinci.asp
www.family.org/married/growth/a0029682.cfm
A webpage with links to a number of articles about the authority of
Scripture.
www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/bible.asp
6. The first quotation is from Saying 105 of “The Gospel of
Thomas.” The second quotation is from Saying 114 of “The Gospel of Thomas.”
Both are quoted in Peter Jones, “Pagans in the Pews: How the New Spirituality Is
Invading Your Home, Church and Community” (
7. Dr. Alfred Kinsey has been charged with doing fraudulent research.
In addition, his study on child sexuality involved pedophiles who molested hundreds of
children.
www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/2004/article/2065
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16148
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16066
www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.html
The impact of Dr. Kinsey and his followers on American morality,
society, and legislation
www.issues-views.com/index.php/sect/2004/article/2065
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16066
www.centerfordecency.org/Sexualize.htm
www.savethemales.ca/161101.html
www.newswithviews.com/Blumenfeld/Samuel2.htm
www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0030.html
A website with information about the sexual revolution and its effect
on our society. It has articles, white papers, and information about books.
British television produced a TV documentary called “Secret
History: Kinsey’s Paedophiles.” It included an interview with a woman who (when
she was a child) was sexually abused as part of Kinsey’s research.
http://home.att.net/~r.s.mccain/kinsey.html
www.irlnet.com/aprn/archive/1998/August13/13tv.html
http://home.att.net/~r.s.mccain/reisman.html
http://english.pravda.ru/columnists/2002/12/09/40565.html
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=16282
A British medical journal (“The Lancet”) published an article
saying that Kinsey’s research was based on the sexual abuse of children.
www.familyaction.org/Articles/article-pgs/kinsey-youth-sex.htm
Some of Kinsey’s data about child sexuality came from a Nazi
officer in
www.cwfa.org/articles/3147/CFI/cfreport/
www.boundless.org/2002_2003/features/a0000729.html
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29891
www.jimbarnwell.com/article012003.htm
8. Reviews of Bishop Spong’s book, “Why Christianity Must Change or Die”
http://gear.dyndns.org/~spencer/Theology/spongnewchristianitybookreview.html
www.spiritualityhealth.com/newsh/items/bookreview/item_1619.html
www.bookfinder.us/review6/0060675365.html
Spong’s 12 theses
www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/articles/12855.htm
Bishop Spong, “In Search of God: Is Atheism the Only Alternative
to Theism?”
www.positiveatheism.org/writ/spong983.htm
Bishop Spong, “Can One Be a Christian Without Being a
Theist?”
www.dioceseofnewark.org/vox21096.html
An interview with Bishop Spong
www.whosoever.org/v6i5/spong.html
A television interview with Bishop Spong. The first link gives general
information. The second is a full transcript of the interview.
www.abc.net.au/compass/s441968.htm
http://abc.net.au/compass/intervs/spong2001.htm
9. Chuck Colson, “The Da Vinci Conspiracy: Distinguishing Fact
from Fiction,” in “Christian Examiner on the Web,” April 2004. (I realize
that many Christians disagree with Chuck Colson about various issues. However, his
practical approach of talking with people who read the book is helpful. And what he
learned from those people is valuable information. It demonstrates the real-life impact of
the book.)
www.christiantimes.com/Articles/Chuck%20Colson/Art_Apr04_Colson.html
10.
James L. Garlow and Peter Jones, “Cracking Da Vinci’s
Code” (
Articles about “The Da Vinci Code”
www.crosswalk.com/fun/1212187.html
www.christianity.ca/entertainment/books/2004/05.003.html
www.family.org/married/growth/a0029682.cfm
www.boundless.org/departments/pages/a0000882.html
www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0413davinci.asp
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040216-121916-6332r.htm
www.tfp.org/student_action/opinions/culture/davinci.htm
www.tektonics.org/davincicrude.htm
www.irr.org/da-vinci-code.html
www.leaderu.com/focus/davincicode.html
www.crisismagazine.com/september2003/feature1.htm
www.spu.edu/depts/uc/response/Spring2k4/bookfilm/expanded.html
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/282004mc.asp
A study of the book, in three parts. (There is a picture near the top
of each part of the article. Go below the picture to continue reading.)
www.beliefnet.com/story/145/story_14506_1.html
www.beliefnet.com/story/145/story_14506_2.html
www.beliefnet.com/story/145/story_14506_3.html
Three articles from “Christianity Today”
www.christianitytoday.com/le/2004/002/13.13.html
Copyright 2004 by Mary Ann Collins. All rights reserved.
You may e-mail the author at:
MaryAnnCollins@Juno.Com
or visit http://www.newlifewithchrist.com
for more information